Benefactor ben·e·fac·tor benəfaktər, noun
plural: benefactors
- a person who gives money or other help to a person or cause.
- synonyms: patron, from the Latin Patri Father
- "And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors. But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve. For whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat, or he that serveth? is not he that sitteth at meat? but I am among you as he that serveth.
" Luke 22:25-27
This was a primary instruction by Christ to his apostles when he appointed them a kingdom.
- "And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me;" Luke 22:29
The same reference to governments that exercise authority one over the other is found in :
- Matthew 20:25 But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.
And
- Mark 10:42 But Jesus called them to him, and saith unto them, Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them.
All these direct statements from Jesus include the admonition that "But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;"
The early Church had to take care of the daily ministration to the needy and feed the flock of Jesus Christ often by sharing free bread from house to house.
- Acts 2:46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,
Anyone who got the Baptism of the Apostles instead o the Baptism of Herod were cast out of the system of social welfare run through the temples.
- John 9:22 These [words] spake his parents, because they feared the Jews: for the Jews had agreed already, that if any man did confess that he was Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue.
At Pentecost thousands and thousands of Jews opted out of the social welfare system set up by Herod and the Pharisees and opted into the social welfare system of Christ.
Christ system operated by charity and love and the perfect law of liberty while the one of Herod's operated by forcing its members to pay in but making the word of God to none effect.
These Apostles and a network of ministers that came together in the upper room were to feed his sheep and love one another.
They would have to take care of the social welfare of the people through faith, hope and charity and the perfect law of liberty because they would be kicked out of the social welfare system set up by Herod and other countries like Rome.
A lot of people think the phrase "Taxation without representation is in the declaration of independence.
Not so.
They were complaining about "taxation without consent".
Consent was not collective for America was not a democracy. Most of the colonies were talking about being a republic. That does not mean an indirect democracy but a society of freemen owning their own land and untaxed on that land.
How do they get consent? Contract. You have to apply for benefits or protection from your liege.
It is to him you owe your allegiance. A liege is "concerned with or relating to the relationship between a feudal superior and a vassal."
These applications for benefits from someone who exercises authority to be a benefactor to you diminishes your rights or at least the access to them and increase the power and authority of your liege.
This is why Paul, James, Jesus,Moses and the ten commandments told you not to make either application nor contract with these men who call themselves benefactors but exercise authority one over the other.
The Real Destroyers of the Liberties
For centuries men have gathered together in order to institute forms of government to secure to themselves and their posterity natural rights. To guarantee the loyalty or fidelity of the members of their community or nation in the face of chaos and calamity, in what is often a perilous world, numerous methods and schemes of society and government have been relied upon or applied.
The symbiotic relationship of men and their governments, alters both men and their institutions. This change is wrought according to the spirit moving in the hearts and mind of the people. Government has no mind, no heart, no soul of its own. Its character is entirely dependent upon the character of the people who form it, give it purpose, and give it life. There seems to be two forms of fidelity at war in the formation of all governments, one born of the love of law, and the other born of the law of love.
Because the opinions of men are as varied as men themselves, we must define terms like law and love to understand the conflict.
“The laws of nature are most perfect and immutable; but the condition of human law is an unending succession, and there is nothing in it which can continue perpetually.
Human laws are born, live, and die.”
It is love of human law of which we speak. “The civil law is what a people establishes for itself.” That human law is dependent upon the moral character of the people who make it. The laws men make for themselves are created by contracts and constitutions, which requires the consent of the people. “All government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery!” This is because “What is mine cannot be taken away without consent.”
The Declaration of Independence was not about rebellion by the people, but the unwarranted usurpations of George III. Americans had begun to realize that with every right there is a concomitant responsibility. It was their uncommon struggle for centuries prior to the revolution, to bear those responsibilities that set Americans free. It was the daily unselfish sacrifice of settlers who cared for themselves and their neighbor, which set the spirit of liberty aflame in the hearts and minds of the people. The exercise of responsibility by those who came to America seeking civil and religious freedom had made the King's acts unwarranted usurpation of natural rights.
That Declaration did not complain of taxation without representation but, “For imposing taxes on us without our Consent:” Governments receive all their lawful power to govern through the consent of the governed. That consent is given by both executed and implied acts of agreement. Those agreements are the contract and “The contract makes the law.”
There is no perfect contract because there are no perfect men. Contracts create obligations and duties, and grant increasing degrees of power and authority. “Constantly bearing in mind that entering into society, individuals must give up a share of liberty…” The more we turn to government to obtain benefits, the less liberty the people have.
“Pacta sunt servanda.”
The more we seek to benefit from institutions of government the more we enter into its realm of authority and the less liberty we will have. The more we seek to provide for ourselves and our community without government, the more free we will become. “As long as we look to government to solve our problems, we will always suffer tyranny.” To love benefits offered at the price of someone else's liberty is to love the human law that provides them more than we love our neighbor.
There are also at least two kinds of love. There is the love for things that make us feel alive, and there is the love we have that gives life to others. The former is a selfish love, motivated, in some, by desire and narcissistic wantonness, while the latter is a love of sacrifice and of service. It is the dominance of one form of love or the other in the hearts of the people that determines the nature of their government, and the freedom and liberty enjoyed by the individuals in a society.
This is why the Bible tells us, in the words of both Moses and Christ, that we must love our neighbor, his rights, his life, and his liberty as much as we love our own. If we do not, then the government we create shall be more of a snare than a salvation. “This Bible is for the Government of the People, by the People, and for the People.”
“When people have to obey other people’s orders, equality is out of the question.”
The Bible warns us not to consent, not to make covenants or contracts, to not take oaths or swear, but most of all to not take benefits from men who can rule over us and our neighbor.
We are not to take benefits from rulers who call themselves benefactors, but exercise authority because they only offer to us what they have already taken from our neighbor. We know we are also not to covet our neighbors goods. Once we accept the idea that it is okay to take from our neighbor, if it is taken by government first, then a whole nation may be corrupted. “All who have ever written on government are unanimous, that among people generally corrupt, liberty cannot long exist.” There are several reasons why we should not want to benefit from such a social scheme, but at least one is to keep us from being snared back into bondage.
Governments, or at least men who seek power, often offer benefits to get the people to enter deeper into the realm and authority of government, until what should have been for their welfare becomes a snare.
It was stated thousands of years ago that:
“The real destroyers of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits.”
But, “No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. But if he does not dissent, he will be considered as assenting.” So, who is the real destroyer of liberty? Is it the one who makes the offer or the one accepts it?
Have we sold our birth right for a pot of benefits? Men have lost their liberty in the land their fathers once struggled and died upon to establish freedom. They have become little more than human resources bound under human law. Though the responsibility of what we have become rests heavy on our own shoulders, there is hope, for those who will carry the burden of that common shame.
“Freedom is the Right to Choose, the Right to create for oneself the alternatives of Choice. Without the possibility of Choice, and the exercise of Choice, a man is not a man but a member, an instrument, a thing.”
We live in perilous times, but with change there will be choices. We may not be able to alter the course of history, but we may alter the path we choose to take through it. While no creation of an alternative institution or government may free us from or impair the obligation of contract, it may set a portion of society on the path to liberty that will sustain those who will seek righteousness under the law of love.
Footnotes:
|
|
|
